The Kentucky Climate Symposium
Kentucky Climate Services Summit
July 16, 2024

“What is this place that we’re all trying to get to that feels secure in an age of climate change?”
Association for Rhetoric of Science, Technology, & Medicine
May 23, 2024

The Kentucky Climate Oral History Project with the Louie B. Nunn Center for Oral History
UK Office of the Vice President for Research, February 7, 2024
Tracing topoi rooted in failure and safety through climate change discourse offers a promising way to understand how different rhetors characterize the history of climate action and their definitions of success. This talk presents just such a tracing, focusing on an archive of oral histories collected from climate activists, policymakers, and researchers in Kentucky. Using transcripts of these interviews, I identify instances of failure and safety topoi, both unique and shared, across the oral history collection.
This presentation provides a brief overview of the Kentucky Climate Research, Policy, and Activism project, which is a collection of oral history interviews with Kentuckians working on climate issues. The presentation covers what the project is, how it got started, how it was managed, and what's next.
Picture
Photo credit: Tyler Hoff, CC BY 2.0, photo has been cropped
Picture
Photo credit: Tyler Hoff, CC BY 2.0, photo has been cropped

Using Ancient Greek Rhetoric to Understand Contemporary Controversies in Kentucky
BSCTC, November 28, 2023

Climate Change: What It is, How We Know, and What We Can Do About It
Lexington Green Chalice Webinar, 2023
This presentation provides a brief overview of rhetoric and the psycho-social factors that make communicating about controversial issues so challenging. After establishing that most communication problems can't be solved by simply explaining facts better or clearer or more loudly, Dr. Cagle offers a concept from rhetorical theory to help manage communication about controversies. "Stasis theory" is a way of analyzing arguments and articulating exactly what the points of disagreement in them are. Using a case study of debates about the flood relief fund in Kentucky, I show how the humanist tradition of rhetoric allows us to better understand why reasonable people disagree.
Dr. Amanda Gumbert and Dr. Lauren Cagle from the Kentucky Climate Consortium are excited to share the latest science on climate change and what we can do about it in a series of two presentations. In the first presentation, they’ll explain what we know about climate change and how we know it, then busting some common myths about contemporary climate change. They’ll focus on climate impacts in Kentucky, such as shifts in temperature and increases in rainfall. In the second presentation, they’ll talk more about rainfall and the water cycle in Kentucky, which affects our drinking water, stormwater runoff, and lawns, gardens, and other green spaces. You’ll learn about climate change and what you can do about it here at your own church and in your own homes and neighborhoods!

Using Lessons from Engaged Research to Develop The Kentucky Climate Consortium
IECA Conference on Communication & the Environment, 2023

Civility & Climate Change:
Why Climate Change is So Hard to Talk About & How to Talk About it Anyway
Kenton County Public Library Lunch & Learn Series, 2023

13 Ways of Looking at Climate Change in Kentucky
Bluegrass Greensource Sustainability Summit, 2023

A somewhat depressing but also action-oriented tour through specific ways climate change impacts are showing up in Kentucky, from water systems to livestock management to the fight for affordable housing. The 13 examples of Kentucky climate impacts are follow by 13 actions to take.

Bottling Serendipity
Making an Engaged Transdisciplinary Research Agenda out of Eclectic Interests

This talk presents a bit of scholarly background on me and how I collaborate, followed by  examples of my 'solo' research and engaged research collaborations. It concludes with reflection on how research methods and ethics find their way into academic organizational and community building.

Engaged Technical & Scientific Communication
Rooting Rhetorical Research in Place

In this talk, I’ll provide a brief overview of both rhetoric of science and technical communication, my dual areas of expertise, and then describe how I’ve developed an engaged research programme by building place-based collaborations with The Arboretum, The State Botanical Garden of Kentucky, and the Kentucky Geological Survey. To illustrate these two collaborations, I’ll tell the stories of how they got started and share the research questions, methods, and findings we have co-developed in support of my partners’ organizational goals and stakeholder relations.

Crossing Boundaries into Communities
How Professional & Technical Communicators Can Contribute to Interpretive Planning Processes

This research paper describes a multi-disciplinary and community-oriented collaboration focused on developing a master interpretive plan for the state botanical garden of Kentucky, The Arboretum. This collaboration illustrates existing overlaps between two distinct areas of practice: 1) professional and technical communication (PTC) and 2) interpretive planning. To illustrate the role PTC can play in interpretive planning, this paper first presents a brief history of the author’s collaboration with The Arboretum, then describes the interpretive planning process, which includes audience analysis research led by the author.

Insights into Communicating with Stakeholders about Water & Climate in Kentucky
Public Workshop reporting on Kentucky Water Resources Research Institute grant results 2019

What do Kentuckians think about the water and climate issues we face in the Commonwealth? Results from our statewide survey will provide insights on how to best communicate such issues with stakeholders and can help you improve the effectiveness of your programming. This webinar event and in-person workshop is relevant to county extension agents, water professionals, community leaders, and the like. Survey results and analysis include quantitative and qualitative data.

"The New World Order behind the Green Mask": White Nationalism, Anti-Semitism, & the A21 Conspiracy Theory
Conference on Communication & the Environment 2019

This paper presents an analysis of the rhetorical strategies used on the “Democrats Against U. N. Agenda 21” conspiracy theory website to frame climate change, sustainability, and the U.N. as existential threats to democracy and freedom. The rhetorical strategies in use across this site reveal the Agenda 21 conspiracy’s roots in white nationalism and anti-semitism. This research furthers rhetorical scholarship on conspiracies; use of evidence.

How (Not) to Respond to Climate Change Denial
UK Climate Week Teach-In 2019

This presentation and role-playing activity provide a crash course in how to talk with climate change deniers in order to have productive conversations about climate change. It begins with a brief overview of climate science, then provides a taxonomy of climate change denialist talking points. Following that, I review three major challenges to talking about climate change, then offer strategies for responding to each of those challenges. We conclude with a role-playing activity in which partners get to know each other in an attempt to find shared values on the basis of which to have a conversation about climate change.

Evaluating and Addressing Climate Awareness and Water in Kentucky
KWRRI Symposium 2019

This presentation reports on a project that seeks to increase climate awareness, particularly as it relates to Kentucky’s water resources. Specific objectives are to 1) develop a consortium of Kentucky climate researchers and educators to promote collaboration and information sharing on climate awareness issues, 2) develop a website linking Kentucky’s citizens, students, and teachers to the consortium and Kentucky-focused climate resources, 3) evaluate current levels of climate awareness in Kentucky’s population (eastern, central, and western regions) with a focus on water resources, 4) develop a set of training materials.

Distributed Accountability: Technical Communication and the Non-Human Environment
ATTW 2019

This presentation addresses technical communication’s accountability to and for a non-human stakeholder: the environment. Material analyses of the environment are well-established in rhetoric of science, indigenous studies, and science and technology studies (see e.g., Druschke & McGreavy, 2016; Kimmerer, 2013; Latour 2014); extending these analyses to TC provides a productive approach to understanding the complexity of accountability across TC’s many iterations. This presentation focuses on the critical gap between conceptions of “accountability for” and “accountability to,” which offer different models for understanding our relationships as scholars  (and more broadly, as humans) with the environment.

Geoscience, Political Controversy, and the Public Interest
Kentucky Geological Survey
Stakeholder Seminar Keynote 2019

This presentation provides a brief overview of rhetoric and the psycho-social factors that make communicating about controversial science so challenging. After establishing that most science communication problems can't be solved by simply explaining the science better or clearer or more loudly, I offer a concept from rhetoric to help manage communication about controversial science. "Stasis theory" is a way of analyzing arguments and articulating exactly what the points of disagreement in them are. Using a case study of debates about solar energy in Kentucky, I argue  that if we can figure out exactly where we disagree, perhaps we can collaboratively deliberate about a way forward.

Service Learning as a Model for Legitimizing Rhetorical Evidence in Transdisciplinary Partnerships
Association for Rhetoric of Science, Technology, & Medicine @ NCA 2018

Using a specific example course in which I partnered with the Kentucky Division for Air Quality, I argue that service learning offers RSTM an accessible model for developing transdisciplinary relationships; these relationships can provide structured ways for partners to engage with us and co-develop evidentiary approaches that are relevant to our field but also useful for theirs. The familiarity of service learning pedagogy may help RSTM scholars to make inroads as they work to legitimize rhetorical methods and evidence for far-flung fields.

Civility and Climate Change:
How (Not) to Talk about Scientific Controversy
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
University Forum Lecture Series

Climate change is one of the most controversial scientific topics in politics and the public sphere. Despite strong scientific evidence, people still wonder if the anthropogenic climate change is real. Just as contentious are debates about what mitigation and adaptation strategies are feasible and desirable, given their political and economic ramifications. This lecture surveys some of the reasons that climate change has become so controversial and provides productive ways of talking about climate change that draw from rhetorical and ethical theory.


[email protected] | 859.257.1115